Eh Nothing against the Canadiansunless you consider them (which they are) part and parcel of the militarys NorthCom (USA Canada and Mexico military cooperationbig time); or if you consider them a leading light in NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreementwhich they are); and socially where they tend to be far more progressive (and influential) than the lower 48 . . . in other words Canadas complicity is as rife as that of the USA in the formation of the North American Federated Union (NAFU which rhymes with SNAFU: Situation Normal All Fouled Up). Find out what the Three Amigos put together down in Texas. Now that the Pledge of Alliance is considered a prayer . . . we can change it to say: . . . and to the Republic for which it STOOD!

This article tells the 2004 Presidential election experience of one liberal American. It reflects the frustration of the election and the subsequent irritation with the liberal base in this country.

I recently wrote an article entitled: Howard Deans Big Fat Mouth. But before I could refresh my screen he exchanged feet (i.e. thats the only time he opens his mouth) and claimed victory for the Dems. in the special Ohio congressional race. Victory Yep favored to lose by 4 TDs we lost by a field goalthence we utterly embarrassed the h-e-double-toothpicks out of the winners and thusly was the empiric victory declared! This quackery of Democratic interpolation bespeaks of Britains demise at Dunkirk. Alas! We live to fight another day. Not bad but come on Dean what have you done for me latelyperhaps you need to reread a resurrected piece of literature to refresh your screen as well Guess again maybe our strategy isnt working your interpretations sure arent!

If I only had the money-I'd start my own political party....it seems like Republicans are two seperate groups...like Hannity Ann Coulter Rush Limbaugh and the like...what ARE the Dems about...it's weird.

This is an article about how career politicians are not representing our best interest. These career politicians day after day demonstrate that they have absolutely no idea on how to run a business and the U.S. Government is similar to a major publically held corporation.

This article debates whether the Social Security system in the US is going broke and whether it should be privitized or not.

Radical Terrorism" (a.k.a. Islamic Terrorism) is breaking out all over the globe. Iran’s surge into fundamentalism’s nuclear club is one intolerable thought—Osama’s dirty-little suit case bombs coming across the USA-Mexican border is another! All this while Bolton ascends to the UN, CAFTA is passed by the Congress, and the Unions self-destruct . . . not bad for a week’s worth of work . . . once again, theology plays a big part in all this.

It appears the politically obvious culturally detestable and morally repugnant has taken place: We've awakened the beast of Radical Islam to wit a Crusade! Coming to terms with the theological implications of this conflict has not been an easy proposal--but now we're committed (after endless bombings throughout the planet) the race to democratize the Middle East is all the more concentrated and unavoidable. Notwithstanding our penchant for getting into someone's face it behooves us to probe for now the parameters of the eschatology permeating the debate: To be or not to be democratized.

This article was written by one of German ancestry whose forebears on his mother’s side can be traced to Martin Luther himself; thence, the incessant interest in the rise of Adolf Hitler and, in particular (through years of research) the under girding support he derived in his ascendancy from the Christian religion in the heart of Europe. How could this possibly happen...

I was taking a break in the Lake District recently when I heard the news of Londons successful 2012 Olympic bid. I returned the following day to the contrasting news of terror in London blitzed by four bombs striking four poor parts of our capital city.